-
BB Check Raise
Posted by rabman50 on June 15, 2021 at 11:01 pmGame Hand #830378027 – Tournament #24713388 – Holdem(No Limit) – Level 1 (250.00/500.00)- 2021/05/30 17:08:16 UTC
Table ’39’ 8-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: rabman (63730.00)
Seat 2: JIyIIIKa (62480.00)
Seat 3: Texitt (69178.00)
Seat 4: grindmaster1 (81495.00)
Seat 5: Bubbles3981 (63730.00)
Seat 6: MrSixx9 (63362.00)
Seat 7: verboten1 (52295.00)
Seat 8: DaFenix (63730.00)
DaFenix posts the small blind 250.00
rabman posts the big blind 500.00
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Main pot 520.00
Dealt to rabman [Qd Kd]
JIyIIIKa folds
Texitt folds
grindmaster1 folds
Bubbles3981 folds
MrSixx9 folds
verboten1 raises 1135.00 to 1135.00
DaFenix folds
rabman calls 635.00
*** FLOP *** [Jd 4s 8d]
Main pot 3040.00
rabman checks
verboten1 bets 1020.00
rabman raises 3123.00 to 3123.00
verboten1 folds
Uncalled bet (2103.00) returned to rabman
rabman does not show
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 5080.00
Board [Jd 4s 8d]
Seat 1: rabman did not show and won 5080.00
I’ve been working on my 3-bet ranges and my check-raising. I made a note on this hand asking myself if this should be in my 3-betting range. Looking for answers from all you wizards.
I feel that the semi-bluff check raise is fine in this spot. My question is on the sizing. Here I went about 3X the c-bet. Is this too much? Is this not enough?
fivebyfive replied 3 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies -
2 Replies
-
Hey Rob, I’m no wizard but I definitely like the KQ suited 3-bet from the big-blind versus a button open. Against and early/mid raise, I would be much more prone to just call.
As for the check-raise, I can argue a call or check-raise, but that’s not the point. The question is bet size. You are over 100 big blinds deep here, so I don’t think you need to strategize about how to get it all-in. Because they only bet 1/3 pot, its worth considering what we think they are doing here. The only draw on the board is T9.
I think a 3x re-raise is fine here; if you get called you are ultimately putting in 3,123 to win 9,200 with our bet; so definitely giving yourself the right odds assuming you have 15 outs (but don’t even need that many).
The only consideration I would have is what is your plan with your check-raise if they decide to re-raise again? I’m still pretty comfy but would like to control pot size a bit. so I might dip it to about 2.5x.
Either way with this board they are likely polarized so it’s an easy fold or and easy call/raise for them with their holding.
Rambling; curious about the wizards.
-
My thought is that this deep we should be 3-betting this hand against a button open unless we have some villain reads. KQs has so much blocker and playability potential for us and the button is so wide that it is a great 3b candidate. I think I’m mostly 3betting this hand down to around a 30-40bb stack where I will begin flatting it instead. I just checked on Floptimal too. That doesn’t go this deep, but at 75bb it is a pure 3bet. It doesn’t start flatting really until it has a 25 bb stack.
But let’s proceed as played through a call. We reach this flop about 100bb effective. I like the check raise here! Not only do we have a lot of equity, this board slightly favors our range. If V is continuing with 70% of their range (basically anything with any equity: all pairs, all draws including gutshots, two overs) and we’re check raising with all of our sets, two pairs, flush draws, and a few Jx with some backdoor equity that’s around 12-14% of our range depending on some preflop defense assumptions. When we plug this in, our x-raise range has a ~64% equity advantage against the button’s cbet range. Our actual hand has 57% equity.
I’m out of position with a hand that has equity, and although it seems pretty good, it isn’t even really one of my strongest holdings that I can have with this action. I don’t really mind being called, but I also don’t mind getting folds. Because of all that and because we’re out of position and because we’re so deep, I like a slightly larger sizing. I would make this 3500-4000. But I’d be curious about other opinions.
Log in to reply.