RecPoker Forums

Find answers, ask questions, and connect with our community!

  • Power of the Micro-sized C bet

    Posted by marcel-dusyk on February 5, 2023 at 5:32 pm

    Thank you Chris for the latest Deep Dive on C bet sizing. Was able to use the info right away in a live tournament. Second level of the tournament at 100-200 blinds, everyone fairly deep. Hero raises to 600 from UTG+1 with K9s. 6 callers!! Flop Q33o. Bet 400, about 10% of pot and everyone folds. Shock and amazement cascades through my neural network. A new strategy to use that will be even more effective with a heads up or 3 way flop. Thanks again Chris!

    eanderson85 replied 1 year, 2 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • fivebyfive

    Administrator
    February 6, 2023 at 11:02 am

    They have it or they don’t! You love to see it.

  • fivebyfive

    Administrator
    February 6, 2023 at 4:33 pm

    This is really challenging to answer in a 6-way hand. It depends where we’re defending from and who is all making this kind of play. I’m not even sure if the microbet is a good idea in this format because, ugh, it is so so complicated. But let’s simplify and then work backwards from there. If we call an UTG+1 open at 80bb deep and from the BB and then see them microbet into us after we ck, how do we proceed?

    Well, we still fold a lot of junk. Our offsuit garbage and our suited combos below the Q that can’t make backdoor straights. We raise most of our 3x, as well as some suited combos with overcards and backdoors (A2s, A4s, A5s, 54s, K2s), and a few of our best Qx. We’re flatting with a lot of the other stuff (JJ-22, lots of our other Ax/Kx holdings, most of our Qx holdings).

    If this is our approach heads up, we need to account for all the people behind us multiway. It forces us to play more honest and tighter. So where a hand like As2s is an appealing raise on Qs3h3d HU vs. a microbet, it is a big error multiway if we have several players left to act behind us. My raising and calling range would become a lot more value dense and speculative (with an eye toward value or ability to make the nuts). The more opponents I have, the more heavily I’d weight my raising range to 3s. I would almost never raise a Q here. I’d still likely fold much of the same range I would, adding in a few more combos to account for the multiway nature.

  • eanderson85

    Member
    February 20, 2023 at 6:59 pm

    Looks good to me. In MP I lost top full house to quads, and full house over full house.

Log in to reply.