pokergeekmn
Forum Replies Created
-
pokergeekmn
MemberJanuary 24, 2022 at 7:33 pm in reply to: JOIN —Seminar—Monday Jan 24 Signup (Satellites)I’m available if you have a need too.
-
I’m available, but put me at the end of the line to allow people who haven’t played as much a chance.
-
I’m in if there are any spots left.
-
I haven’t used it myself.
-
pokergeekmn
AdministratorJanuary 6, 2021 at 10:20 am in reply to: Theory question on a monotone boardExcellent and surprising insights.
-
pokergeekmn
AdministratorDecember 27, 2020 at 1:52 pm in reply to: Using PokerTracker to track RecPoker Home GamesIn general I would not use a VPN while playing PokerStars. It is against their terms of service to manipulate your location. So using a VPN that exists locally may be ok, but definitely never play real money while using a VPN.
I personally make sure my VPN is not running before launching PokerStars.
-
I think I found the hand in my hand history. I’ve re-created it on Share My Pair. It’s a little different than described above, but I think it is the correct hand.
PokerStars – 25/50 Ante 6 NL – Holdem – 7 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
schneidz33 (CO): 2,849
Wolfman109 (BTN): 2,958
mbabker (SB): 2,821
Obner (BB): 3,007
PokerGeekMN (UTG): 7,461
GRG646 (UTG+1): 8,055
nehianh (MP): 2,945
7 players post ante of 6, mbabker posts SB 25, Obner posts BB 50
Pre Flop:(pot: 117) PokerGeekMN has Q:heart: J:heart:
PokerGeekMN raises to 125, fold, fold, fold, Wolfman109 raises to 350, fold, fold, PokerGeekMN calls 225
Flop: (817, 2 players) Q:diamond: 3:spade: 2:diamond:
PokerGeekMN checks, Wolfman109 checks
Turn: (817, 2 players) 3:heart:
PokerGeekMN bets 550, fold
PokerGeekMN wins 817
-
I don’t specifically remember this hand, but I’ll try to find it with my hand histories. I’m surprised I limped UTG. Usually that means it was a mis-click, or I was at a rush to return to the game. So I don’t have a way of guessing my range, in that I usually don’t do that.
One of my strategies when I get a bigger stack is to apply a lot of pressure. I could have done that with any pocket pair, although I doubt I would have had Jacks or higher given that I didn’t re-raise pre. I would have definitely done this If I held a three. Given the mis-click, Q3s wouldn’t be completely out of my range either.
Given the play is out of character for me, I would have probably called the turn bet and re-evaluate on the river. The problem is I will sometimes give up, sometimes fire with air, and sometimes fire with a very strong hand on the river. However I probably wouldn’t bet with anything that a pair of queens would bet.
I’ll try to find the hand in my hand history and see what is up.
-
Sounds like a good idea to me.
-
pokergeekmn
AdministratorSeptember 10, 2020 at 8:16 am in reply to: Using PokerTracker to track RecPoker Home GamesExcellent!! Thanks everyone for helping on the details. Glad it worked for you @RichDietz-MrDzzz18
-
pokergeekmn
AdministratorSeptember 7, 2020 at 10:10 pm in reply to: Using PokerTracker to track RecPoker Home GamesI had to re-install on a new machine in the last month. I’ll try it again soon.
-
@rabman50 What rules are we covering on September 2?
-
Minnesota does have 2-100 spread limit. It approximates NLHE, but there isn’t as much implied pressure because the max bet size is 100 chips. So a $50 bet on the turn sets up a $100 bet on the river instead of a $125-175 bet. It also dramatically reduces your opportunities to use the over bet.
-
The payouts are listed in the results of the TOC post.
1: Frogman-Rick (United States), 161,500 (50%)
2: EANDERSON85 (United States), 96,900 (30%)
3: RecPokerSteve (United States), 64,600 (20%)https://rec.poker/announcements/online-home-game-results/nightly-series-toc-june-2020/
-
I’m also curious. I’d be interested to see how many people are there as well.